<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Room 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200701/room-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200701/room-101/</link>
	<description>ranting and rambling to anyone willing to listen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seb Crump</title>
		<link>http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200701/room-101/comment-page-1/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb Crump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200701/room-101/#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>Nice one...

My wife would certainly agree with you on the first (if you broadened it out to be gender neutral ;). I must say haven&#039;t yet encountered this - but I think I&#039;d vote for this to go in.

On the second I (or perhaps Mr Merton) would argue that those stupid enough to take part lose what they deserve. On the other hand there is a duty to protect the vulnerable from themselves... in the balance, but they annoy me too, so &quot;in they go&quot;.

I too hate reality TV, but is it reasonable to ban something that undeniably does give some people the mindless entertainment they think they desire. I must confess I don&#039;t watch them, but I do (in passing) enjoy the fallout when they make fools of themselves. Perhaps restrictions on the quantity rather than a ban? Also, aren&#039;t they the TV equivalent of a blog...? So I don&#039;t think these should go in, you&#039;ll have to take them home - perhaps even make one yourself.

Well, from what I&#039;ve read of you, the world certainly wouldn&#039;t be in a worse state... don&#039;t know whether I would be quite prepared to sacrifice all my freedoms though - so with the previso that you let everyone else be overlord too that can go in.

I have no idea about the last one as I don&#039;t do football - but surely it would be covered by the previous as they sound like they&#039;re not making the same decisions you would. So, definitely send them in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one&#8230;</p>
<p>My wife would certainly agree with you on the first (if you broadened it out to be gender neutral <img src='http://www.thepickards.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . I must say haven&#8217;t yet encountered this &#8211; but I think I&#8217;d vote for this to go in.</p>
<p>On the second I (or perhaps Mr Merton) would argue that those stupid enough to take part lose what they deserve. On the other hand there is a duty to protect the vulnerable from themselves&#8230; in the balance, but they annoy me too, so &#8220;in they go&#8221;.</p>
<p>I too hate reality TV, but is it reasonable to ban something that undeniably does give some people the mindless entertainment they think they desire. I must confess I don&#8217;t watch them, but I do (in passing) enjoy the fallout when they make fools of themselves. Perhaps restrictions on the quantity rather than a ban? Also, aren&#8217;t they the TV equivalent of a blog&#8230;? So I don&#8217;t think these should go in, you&#8217;ll have to take them home &#8211; perhaps even make one yourself.</p>
<p>Well, from what I&#8217;ve read of you, the world certainly wouldn&#8217;t be in a worse state&#8230; don&#8217;t know whether I would be quite prepared to sacrifice all my freedoms though &#8211; so with the previso that you let everyone else be overlord too that can go in.</p>
<p>I have no idea about the last one as I don&#8217;t do football &#8211; but surely it would be covered by the previous as they sound like they&#8217;re not making the same decisions you would. So, definitely send them in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark fairlamb</title>
		<link>http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200701/room-101/comment-page-1/#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>mark fairlamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200701/room-101/#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>we&#039;ve been waiting over a fortnight for a new blog and don&#039;t even get a friday joke.
you are slipping young man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;ve been waiting over a fortnight for a new blog and don&#8217;t even get a friday joke.<br />
you are slipping young man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
