Comments on: A Mixed Reception? http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200609/a-mixed-reception/ ranting and rambling to anyone willing to listen Sun, 22 May 2011 09:53:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Erika http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200609/a-mixed-reception/comment-page-1/#comment-188 Erika Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:38:08 +0000 http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200609/a-mixed-reception/#comment-188 Age 12? Wow. I remember being 8 years old sitting in the van with my feet up on the driver's seat in front of me, on a highway road trip. That was 1993. The best the government can do is introduce legislation that prevents injury and death. <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2362782,00.html" rel="nofollow">This article</a> talks about some resulting confusion... I can see why. Age 12? Wow. I remember being 8 years old sitting in the van with my feet up on the driver’s seat in front of me, on a highway road trip. That was 1993. The best the government can do is introduce legislation that prevents injury and death. This article talks about some resulting confusion… I can see why.

]]>
By: JackP http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200609/a-mixed-reception/comment-page-1/#comment-159 JackP Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:56:11 +0000 http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200609/a-mixed-reception/#comment-159 @Erika: I wasn't clear about the context of the law. It <em>was</em> mandatory that small children would have appropriate child seats. It is <em>now</em> also mandatory for children who are under 12 and under a specific height to continue to use a booster seat until they are either 12 or sufficiently tall. @Erika:
I wasn’t clear about the context of the law. It was mandatory that small children would have appropriate child seats. It is now also mandatory for children who are under 12 and under a specific height to continue to use a booster seat until they are either 12 or sufficiently tall.

]]>
By: Erika http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200609/a-mixed-reception/comment-page-1/#comment-158 Erika Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:08:38 +0000 http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200609/a-mixed-reception/#comment-158 Sloppy journalism, indeed. Maybe instead of "mixed," they could have used "a variety of responses," or "somewhat different points of view." I'm shocked they'd even put a child in the front seat, and that it wasn't already mandatory over there, because it is (I believe) in Canada. That's a good point, though... what do you do if you have a small car and have a third kid? Leave one at home with the nanny! It'd be cheaper than buying a minivan. :) Sloppy journalism, indeed. Maybe instead of “mixed,” they could have used “a variety of responses,” or “somewhat different points of view.” I’m shocked they’d even put a child in the front seat, and that it wasn’t already mandatory over there, because it is (I believe) in Canada. That’s a good point, though… what do you do if you have a small car and have a third kid? Leave one at home with the nanny! It’d be cheaper than buying a minivan. :)

]]>