Russell and David

Sunday, December 13, 2009 7:20 | Filed in Science Fiction, TV/Film

I know that I’ve been critical of Russell T. Davies before, particularly in relation to some of the Doctor Who plots before — I’m not going to rehash old ground — but just because I think he’s not done everything right certainly does not mean I think he’s done everything wrong.

The new Doctor Who adventures are at a much higher level than most of the previous adventures. Okay, in some respects this is only natural — technological advances between Patrick Troughton’s tenure and David Tennant’s mean special effects and costumes are so much better that it’s not even fair to make a comparison, but in some other key areas — characterisation, plot, dialogue and so on — it’s perfectly fair to make the comparison.

Look at the way Russell has handled various story arcs, for example — the Bad Wolf motif running through the first series — and you’ll see the clues in retrospect. They were there, but we didn’t pick up on ‘em all first time round. Yes, the denoument to the Master’s story was a bit deux ex machina (planet helps Doctor develop enormous psychic powers) but the backstory given to the villains of the piece is far, far better than it ever used to be.

The Master is no longer just a pantomime villain who happens to be a rogue timelord: he actually has a history, a reason for developing the way he did. I am very much a fan of old-style Doctor Who, but all too often a particular baddie was just churned out without a sufficiently good reason as to why they were there.

Doctor Who - Horror of Fang Rock (Amazon)

Let’s not forget that the original Doctor Who series weren’t all storming successes: for every story with the brooding atmosphere of The Horror of Fang Rock, you’d have something a lot less credible, such as The Invasion Of Time; let’s not forget that while people (including myself) have criticised the new episodes for being at times formulaic and with a tendency for the Doctor to hit uponn the right idea at just that specific point in time necessary, the old Doctors were just as bad.

After all, how many of the classic Doctor Who serials fell into that “base under siege” sort of a story? Loads of the buggers. This didn’t stop good examples of the genre — The Moonbase and The Horror of Fang Rock, for example — being seen as classics. For each original and particularly well-crafted story you can think of for one Doctor, you can probably point to another which was a bit of a stinker… (Pertwee – The Green Death vs Carnival of Monsters, for example).

So it’s unfair and an example of the rose-tinted glasses stuff to think that Doctor Who in the past is something that has ever been let down by the new version, which has taken a lot more time over continuity and actually seems to care about the Doctor Who universe hanging together as a coherent whole rather than just reimagining it between one serial and the next.

And — thank Rassilon — we’ve not had to put up with more than a token appearance of a comedy robot dog.

Russell has taken the script writing of Doctor Who up to a new, particularly exacting high standard. He doesn’t always live up to that target level which he sets himself — and other writers — but he has done Doctor Who a great service by setting that standard there. So thank you, Russell. I may be critical from time to time, but that is only because you have set the standard at such a high level.

David Tennant will also be leaving Doctor Who this winter: having reinvented the role in his own particular image more than any Doctor since the Baker/Davison era (although Eccleston’s part in the revival cannot be overlooked either). I can’t say I’ll be sad to see the end of “allonsy” although despite my initial misgivings (“David bluddy Tennant? who the hell’s he? Oh, that’s him? I can’t imagine him being any good…”) he has proven to be one of the best ever Doctors, bringing real emotion and pathos to the role instead of just furiously muggin his way through the latest script.

Indeed, for the new generation, he will probably define Doctor Who in the way that Tom Baker did for a previous one…

Whether or not he’s the best Doctor to date I’ll leave aside — this is more a question of age and personal preference than some definable ‘best’ — but in my opinion what he has done is provide the highest quality acting seen in Doctor Who to date.

Like Russell, he too has ramped up the popularity of Doctor Who, and I think that the role of Doctor Who is now very much seen as a heavy, important role, as opposed to some minor kids show, which is certainly the impression given in the mid-80s. The whole thing seems more serious; it’s a lot less frivolous; and it actually delivers some quality programming.

I just wanted to put on record my thanks to them for all the good work they’ve done, and to wish them both all the best in the future. Of course, if I don’t like the christmas finale, I’ll still feel entirely free to attempt to tear it to shreds…

…and then next year I can cast my critical eye over Stephen Moffatt and Matt Smith!

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

20 Comments to Russell and David

  1. John H says:

    December 13th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    I agree with a lot of what you say. I think we owe RTD a debt of gratitude for reviving the series. I can’t help being irritated by a lot of the “cheats” in his scripts, though – so many of his stories (particularly the end-of-season specials) seem to rely on a “deus ex machina” and even the recent Waters of Mars (that seems to have gone down well) had the Doctor denying something he had insisted was an unchangeable absolute. I also think RTD’s insistence on getting Christmas references and snow into every Christmas special plumbs depths of tackiness rarely seen in the old series.

    In comparison with Sylvester McCoy – and, to a lesser extent, Colin Baker – both Tennant and Eccleston have disproved Tom Baker’s assertion that the role is “actor proof”. It really does need an accomplished actor, which is why it worked so well with Tennant and Eccleston. Colin Baker struggled a bit under the weight of a clownish costume and misguided direction from his producer and (in my opinion) McCoy was just totally out of his depth, lacking in both the charisma and acting talent needed.

  2. 1234test.com says:

    August 31st, 2011 at 1:18 am

    How To Change Your Business…

    …Having good skills you can successfully do at many more jobs while making less mistakes doing it.[...]…

  3. what is hypnosis says:

    September 25th, 2011 at 9:44 am

    How To Live Your Life The Happy Way…

    It’s a website that is new to this topic, see more if you are interested…[...]…

  4. painting photo says:

    October 2nd, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    New Ideas On How To Lose Weight…

    …When you are aware when working at your projects you can be a lot more successful than if you don’t have much skills…..

  5. paintings from photo says:

    October 4th, 2011 at 11:21 am

    How ToLive Happily Blog…

    …Having the right knowledge you can do quality work at many more things and make less mistakes while doing it……

  6. Fitness Wheel says:

    October 5th, 2011 at 6:05 pm

    Last News In World – Posted Here…

    [...]When you know when working at your projects you can be a lot more successful than if you have no ideas..[...]…

  7. lentes de sol carrera says:

    October 22nd, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    Carrera Has Been On Top For A Long Time…

    [...]If you are conscious what is your job you can do a lot more than if you don’t have much knowledge…[...]…

  8. ray ban aviator outdoorsman says:

    November 8th, 2011 at 1:51 am

    How To Get Ray Ban Cheaply…

    …Having good skills you can successfully do at many more jobs while making less mistakes doing it.[...]…

  9. Business says:

    November 9th, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    You Business Is Stagnating?…

    [...]If you know what is your job you can be a lot more successful than when you have no skills..[...]…

  10. psp battery says:

    November 25th, 2011 at 6:06 pm

    What Are Best Android Phones…

    [...]When you are aware when working at your projects you can do a lot more than if you are completely without ideas….

  11. tom ford tf says:

    December 3rd, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    Download Acne No More…

    [...]When you are aware when working at your projects you can do a lot more than if you are completely without ideas….

  12. wvu mountaineers hats says:

    December 6th, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    Book Stores Online…

    [...]It’s great that individuals nonetheless know quite a bit about thing like that. I got some fascinating strategies from this[...]…

  13. how to advertise for free says:

    December 10th, 2011 at 11:14 pm

    Skills For Life…

    [...]Thank you for posting this exciting info. I will verify your web-site within the future.[...]…

  14. glasögon online says:

    December 15th, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    Solglasögon Online Here…

    [...]This is really cool. Thank you for writting this[...]…

  15. tv news online says:

    December 20th, 2011 at 11:14 pm

    Do You Want Real News?…

    [...]I see you know a whole lot about what you happen to be writing about. Fascinating study. I’ll check out your site inside the future.[...]…

  16. celulares dual chip says:

    February 10th, 2012 at 4:46 pm

    Celular Items…

    [...]Are you totally confident that is the correct information. I head something else. I’ll check your web page inside the long term.[...]…

  17. India Tourism says:

    February 16th, 2012 at 9:54 pm

    Food In India…

    [...]Awesome info that I’ve been seeking for some time! Maintain up using the superior writing.[...]…

  18. ghost lab says:

    March 30th, 2012 at 4:39 pm

    Real Ghost Busters…

    [...]Writing about a topic like that is pretty challenging. I will check out your web-site in the future.[...]…

  19. Spring Trends says:

    April 11th, 2012 at 10:39 pm

    Shoes Are The Most Important Part Of Your Outfit…

    [...]I see you know a good deal about what you happen to be writing about. Interesting study. Thank you for writting this[...]…

  20. Affinity says:

    September 5th, 2012 at 5:12 am

    One or two to rmeebmer, that is.

Leave a comment